Impact analysis of collaborative platforms—The case of SPIKE
International Stability, Volume # 1 | Part# 1
Authors
Broser, Christian; Fritsch, Christoph; Gmelch, Oliver; Pernul, Günther
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.3182/20091028-3-RO-4007.00007
Page Numbers:
24-29
Index Terms
collaboration,networked enterprise,impact analysis,virtual alliance
Abstract
Today's companies are under considerable strain. Several events or developments such as the global economic crises or the ongoing globalization process contribute to this situation. Meanwhile, however, companies have realized that the concept of virtual organizations represents an efficient measure to counter the current challenges. More and more companies make use of this concept supported by technologies like collaboration platforms. However, the application of such collaboration platforms brings along some changes for organizations in doing their business. For instance, interaction between people, who could not get in touch before, is thereby fostered in particular. Employees of different organizations, even across countries' boundaries, can set up new relationships due to the deployment of collaboration platforms. This paper analyses the impact of collaboration platforms and their effects on the daily business of organizations.
References
[1] AT&T Corp. (2008). Collaboration across
borders. Technical report. URL
http://www.corp.att.com/emea/docs/s5_
collaboration_eng.pdf.
[2] Bandinelli, S., Nitto, E.D., and Fuggetta, A. (1996). Supporting
Cooperation in the SPADE-1 Environment.
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22(12),
841-865.
[3] Barabasi, A.L. (2003). Linked: How Everything Is Connected
to Everything Else and What It Means. Plume,
reissue edition.
[4] Borghoff, U.M. and Schlichter, J.H. (2000). Computer-Supported
Cooperative Work: Introduction to Distributed
Applications. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.,
Secaucus, NJ, USA.
[5] Eid, T. and Gartner Research (2007). Web conferencing
and team collaboration software, worldwide, 2006-2011.
[6] Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J., and Rein, G. (1991). Groupware:
Some Issues and Experiences. Communications of the
ACM, Volume 34, Issue 1, 39-58.
[7] Hersh, M. (2001). Technology change, technology transfer
and ethics. In P. Kopacek (ed.), Social Stability:
The Challenge of Technology Development (SWIIS '01,
IFAC), 63-68. Pergamon Press.
[8] Hoogeweegen, M., Teunissen, W., Vervest, P., and Wagenaar,
R. (1999). Modular Network Design: Using Information
and Communication Technology to Allocate
Production Tasks in a Virtual Organization. Decision
Sciences 30 (4), 1073-1103.
[9] Kanter, R.M. (1994). Collaborative advantage - the art of
alliances. Hardvard Business Review, July-August.
[10] Kile, F. (2001). Insights into future international social
stability. In P. Kopacek (ed.), Social Stability: The Challenge
of Technology Development (SWIIS '01, IFAC),
45. Pergamon Press.
[11] Laurillau, Y. and Nigay, L. (2002). Clover architecture for
groupware. In CSCW, 236-245.
[12] Reding, V. (2005). i2010: The European Commission's
new programme to boost competitiveness in the ICT
sector.
[13] Thompson, K. (2008). The Networked Enterprise: Competing
for the Future Through Virtual Enterprise Networks.
[14] van Heck, E. and Vervest, P. (2007). Smart Business
Networks: How the Network Wins. Commun. ACM,
50(6), 28-37.
