Computationally Efficient Sub-Optimal Mid Course Guidance Using Model Predictive Static Programming
World Congress, Volume # 17 | Part# 1
Authors
Dwivedi, Prasiddha Nath; Bhattacharyaa, Abhijit; Padhi, Radhakant
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.00600
Page Numbers:
3550-3555
Index Terms
Model reference adaptive control
Abstract
For a homing interceptor, suitable initial condition must be achieved by mid course guidance scheme for its maximum effectiveness. To achieve desired end goal of any mid course guidance scheme, two point boundary value problem must be solved online with all realistic constrain. A Newly developed computationally efficient technique named as MPSP (Model Predictive Static Programming) is utilized in this paper for obtaining suboptimal solution of optimal mid course guidance. Time to go uncertainty is avoided in this formulation by making use of desired position where midcourse guidance terminate and terminal guidance takes over. A suitable approach angle towards desired point also can be specified in this guidance law formulation. This feature makes this law particularly attractive because warhead effectiveness issue can be indirectly solved in mid course phase.
References
P. Zarchan, Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance, Proceeding in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA Tactical Missile Series, Vol. 176, Third Edition, 1997. D. S. Naidu, Singular Perturbations and Time Scales in Guidance and Control of Aerospace Systems: A Survey, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2001, pp. 1057-1078. A. E. Bryson, Application of Optimal Control Theory in Aerospace Engineering, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, VOl 4, No. 5, 1967, pp. 545-553. A. E. Bryson and Y. C. Ho, Applied Optimal Control, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1975. R. Padhi, An Optimal Explicit Guidance Scheme for Ballistic Missile with Solid Motors, Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Confer- ence, AIAA-1999-4140, 1999, pp. 1006-1016. S. K. Sinha and S. K. Shrivastava, Optimal Explicit Guidance of Multisatge Launch Vehicle Along Three- Dimentional Trajectory, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol 13, No. 3, 1990, pp. 394-403. Prem kumar, P.N Dwivedi ,Abhijeeet bhattacharya, Integrated Guidance and Control Against High Speed Targets with desiredAspect Angle, AIAA Paper No. AIAA-2006-6783. S. M. Roberts and J.S. Shipman, Two Point Bound- ary Value Problems: Shooting Methods, American Elsevier Publishing Company Inc., 1972. D. E. Kirk, Optimal Control Theory: An Introduc- tion, Prentice Hal, 1975. K. KrishnaKumar, G. Limes, K. Gundy-Burlet and D. Bryant, An Adaptive Critic Approach to Refer- ence Model Adaptation,Proceedings of AIAA Guid- ance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA- 2003-5790, 2003. R. Padhi, N. Unnikrishnan and S. N. Balakrishnan Optimal Control Synthesis of a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Single Network Adaptive Critics, Pro- ceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA-2004, 2004, pp. 1592-1597. S. Ferrari and R. F. Stengel, Online Adaptive Critic Flight Control, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol 27, No. 5, 2004, pp. 777-786. D. Han and S.N.Balakrishnan, Adaptive Critic Based Neural Network for Agile Missile Control, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol 25, No. 2, 2002, pp. 404-407. D. Soloway and P. J. Haley, Neural Generalized Predictive Control, Proceeding of IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control , 1996, pp. 277-282. M. Cannon, E�cient Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Algorithms, Annual Reviews in Control, Vol 28, 2004, pp. 229-237. N. Siegers and M. Costello Model Predictive Control of a Parafoil and Payload System Journal of Guid- ance, Control and Dynamics, Vol 28, No.4, 2005, pp. 816-821.
