Differences concerning information when handling critical events in production systems
Cost Oriented Automation, Volume # 8 | Part# 1
Sabina Fjallstrom; Kristina Safsten; Johan Stahre
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
production system,production ramp-up,critical events,information
In this paper, predictable and unpredictable events occurring before production ramp-up are compared from an information perspective. The objective is to identify the type of information required to handle such events, for successful ramp-up performance. An industrial case study shows that major differences between the two types of events concerns information related to problem identification and problem-solving. For unpredictable events, e.g. novel problems, information of a pragmatic character was found important. Domain-related and problem-solving information were vital parts of the pragmatic information. The degree of novelty affected the preferred ways as well as type of information perception.
 Alm, I. and Fjällström, S. (2003) Dealing with production disturbances: The significance of change and pragmatic information. In: Stahre, J. and Mårtensson, L. (Eds) Proc. the 8th IFAC Symp. on Automated Systems Based on Human Skill and Knowledge, Gothenburg, Sweden.  Almgren, H. (1999). Pilot Production and Manufacturing Start-up in the Automotive Industry - Principles for Improved Performance, Doctoral Thesis, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.  Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.  Berglund, M. Skog, E., Öjmertz, B. (2001). Driftsättning av monteringssystem - erfarenheter och synpunkter från svenska industriföretag, IVF-rapport 01009, IVF, Mölndal, Sweden. (in Swedish).  Byström, K., Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use, Information Processing & Management, 31(2), pp. 191-213.  Byström, K. (1999). Task Complexity, Information Types and Information Sources: Examination of Relationships, Academic dissertation, Dept. of Information Studies, Univ of Tampere, Finland.  Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., Tierney, T., (1999). What's your strategy for managing knowledge?, Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp. 106-116.  Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules and knowledge: Signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 13(3), 257-266.  Reason J. and Hobbs A. (2003). Managing maintenance error: a practical guide. Ashgate Publishing Company, Hampshire, England.  Säfsten, K., Fjällström, S., Berg, M., (2006). Production Ramp-up in the Manufacturing Industry - Experiences from a Project under Extreme Time Pressure, In Proc. of the 39th CIRP Int. Sem. on Manuf. Systems, 7-9 June, Ljubljana, Slovenia.  Thunberg, A. (2006). A Cognitive Approach to the Design of Alarm Systems for Nuclear Power Plant Control Rooms, Licentiate thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.  van der Merve, E. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Ramp-up Manufacturing, Dissertation, Manufacturing and Management Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge.  Vincent, A., Ross, D. (2001). Personalize training: determine learning styles, personality types and multiple intelligences online, The Learning Organization, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 36-43.  Weizsäcker, E. von, (1974). Erstmaligkeit und Bestätigung als Komponenten der pragmatischen Information. Weizsäcker, E. von, (Ed.).  Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research design and methods, Sage Publ Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.