A comparative study of deterministic and stochastic optimization methods for integrated design of pr
World Congress, Volume # 16 | Part# 1
Authors
Mario Francisco; Silvana Revollar; Pastora Vega; Rosalba Lamanna
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.3182/20050703-6-CZ-1902.00917
Page Numbers:
916-916
Index Terms
integrated design,sequential quadratic programming,genetic algorithms,stochastic optimization,controllability
Abstract
This paper focuses on the application of stochastic (genetic algorithms, simulated annealing) and deterministic (sequential quadratic programming) optimization methods for the Integrated Design of processes considering dynamical non-linear models. Moreover, a hybrid methodology that combines both types of methods is proposed, showing an improvement on performance. Controllability indexes such as disturbance sensitivity gains, the Hα norm, and the ISE were considered to obtain optimum disturbance rejection. In order to illustrate and validate our proposal, an activated sludge process with PI schemes is taken. The problem is stated as a multiobjective non-linear optimization problem with non-linear constraints. The application of the mentioned strategies is discussed. The results are encouraging for future application of these techniques to solve synthesis MINLP problems.
References
[1] Costa, L. and Oliveira, P. (2001). Evolutionary
Algorithms Approach to the Solution of Mixed
Integer Non-Linear Programming Problems.
Comp. Chem. Eng., 25 257-266.
[2] Edgar, T. and Himmelblau, D. (2001) Optimization
of Chemical Processes. Mc Graw Hill.
[3] Gen, M. and Chen, R. (2000). Genetic algorithms
and engineering optimisation. John Wiley and
Sons.
[4] Gill, P., Murray, W. and Wright, M. (1981) Practical
Optimization. Academic Press.
[5] Kookos I. and Perkins J. (2001). An algorithm for
simultaneous process design and control. Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., 40, pp. 4079-4088.
[6] Laarhoven, P. and Aarts, E. (1987) Simulated
Annealing: Theory and Applications. Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
[7] Luyben, M. L. and Floudas, C. A (1994). Analyzing
the interaction of design and control -1. A
multiobjective framework and application to
binary distillation synthesis, Comp. Chem. Eng.,
18, No. 10, pp. 933-969.
[8] Luyben, W. (1993). Trade-offs Betwen Design and
Control in Chemical Reactor Systems. J. Proc.
Cont. 3, pp. 17-40.
[9] Revollar, S; Vega, P. and Lamanna, R. (2004)
Algorithmic synthesis and Integrated Design of
chemical reactor systems using genetic
algorithms. World Automation Congress (Sevilla,
Spain).
[10] Salamon, P. Sibani, P. and Frost, R. (2002). Facts,
Conjectures, and Improvements for Simulated
Annealing. SIAM monographs on Mathematical
Modelling and Computation.
[11] Tsai, M. and Chang, Ch. (2001). Water usage and
treatment network design using genetic
algorithms Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40, pp. 4874-
4888.
[12] Vega, P. and Gutiérrez, G. (1999). Optimal Design
Control and Operation of wastewater treatment
plants. European Control Conference (Germany).
