Application of a resampling scheme to solve the divergence in the pathwise filter
World Congress, Volume # 16 | Part# 1
Authors
Alexsandro Machado Jacob; Takashi Yoneyama
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.3182/20050703-6-CZ-1902.00042
Page Numbers:
41-41
Index Terms
nonlinear filtering,pathwise filter,Monte Carlo approximation,simulation of SDEs
Abstract
A Monte Carlo-based approach to filtering for nonlinear systems based on the Pathwise theory was proposed by M. H. A. Davis in 1981. The discrete-time Markov chain used to compute the solution of a Fokker-Planck equation whose coefficients were determined by the observed process was here replaced by the simulation of an equivalent stochastic diffierential equation in order to make the filter implementation more clear and with less computational cost. This paper shows that the Pathwise filter for an one-dimensional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck state process with saturation in the observation has an interesting characteristic of divergence in this estimates when the signal-to-noise ratio on the state equation is low. Rewriting the filtering solution in terms of observation-based weights, it is presented that the low performance of the filter can be preliminary explained by the sudden increase of the weight variances. To solve this problem, a resampling scheme using the effective number of particles was used to smooth or, at least, maintain the weight variance controlled.
References
[1] Clark, J. M. C. (1978). Communication Systems
and Random Process Theory. Chap. The design
of robust approximations to the stochastic
differential equations of non-linear filtering,
pp. 721-734. Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
[2] Clark, J. M. C. and D. Crisan (2005). On a robust
version of the integral representation formula
of nonlinear filtering. Probability Theory and
Related Fields. (to appear).
[3] Davis, M. H. A. (1981a). New approach to filtering
for nonlinear systems. IEE Proc. D, Control
Theory and Appl. 128(5), 166-172.
[4] Davis, M. H. A. (1981b). Stochastic systems:
the mathematics of filtering and identification
and applications. Chap. Pathwise non-linear
filtering, pp. 505-528. D. Reidel.
[5] Del Moral, P. and L. Miclo (2000). Séminaire de
Probabilités XXXIV. Chap. Branching and
interacting particle systems approximations
of Feynman-Kac formulae with applications
to non-linear filtering, pp. 1-145. Vol. 1729
of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag.
Berlin.
[6] Doucet, A. (1998). On sequential simulation-based
methods for bayesian filtering. Technical
Report CUED/F-INFENG/TR-31. University
of Cambridge. Cambridge.
[7] Jacob, A. M., E. M. Hemerly and T. Yoneyama
(2004). Improvements on Davis' Monte Carlobased
nonlinear filtering. In: Congresso
Brasileiro de Automática (CBA). Gramado.
[8] Kallianpur, G. and H. Striebel (1968). Estimations
of stochastic processes: Arbitrary system
process with additive white noise observation
errors. Ann. Math. Statist. 39, 785-
801.
[9] Kloeden, P. E. and E. Platen (1999). Numerical
solution of stochastic differential equations.
3rd ed.. Springer. Berlin.
[10] Kushner, H. J. (1977). Probability methods for approximations
in stochastic control and elliptic
equations. Academic Press. New York.
[11] Le Gland, F. (1984). Monte carlo methods in
nonlinear filtering. In: Proceedings of the 23rd
IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.
Las Vegas.
[12] Lipster, R. S. and A. N. Shirayaev (1977). Statistics
of randon processes I: general theory.
Springer-Verlag. New York.
[13] O'Loghlen, J. W. and G. C. Wright (1982). Computer
results for new nonlinear filtering algorithm.
IEE Proc. D, Control Theory and
Appl. 129(2), 70-71.
[14] Pardoux, E. (1981). Stochastic systems: the mathematics
of filtering and identification and applications
. Chap. Non-linear filtering, prediction
and smoothing, pp. 529-557. D. Reidel.
[15] Souza, E. T. de (1992). Métodos numéricos para
filtragem não-linear. Ph.d. thesis. Instituto
Tecnológico de Aeronáutica. São José dos
Campos.
[16] Zakai, M. (1969). On the optimal filtering for
diffusion process. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. 11, 230-
243.
